Neil Francis Lennon’s Ten in a Row (ft Ronny Deila and Brendan Rodgers)

It’s been rather an emotional week for Celtic supporters, the upshot of which is that I have been moved to write a blog, which should tell you something about the severity of the situation. Brendan Rodgers, perhaps the club’s most successful manager of the 21st century, left very abruptly on Tuesday to join Leicester City, and was almost immediately replaced by Neil Lennon, perhaps the club’s most Celtic manager of the 21st century. The identity of Brendan’s successor will have surprised few, and while the suddenness of his departure was a bit of a shock, his leaving itself was hardly a surprise.

ucl
Neil Lennon’s achievements in his first spell as Celtic manager included winning more than one Champions League match

What has apparently been a surprise (to Brendan, at least) is the Celtic fans’ reaction to his going. If you’ve missed this news, allow me to catch you up – it’s been negative. With the club chasing an eighth successive league title and third consecutive Treble, and only 11 league games to go, he decided to jump ship and take over at a mid-table EPL club. Why a careerist football manager to whom this was just another job would do this would puzzle some Celtic fans, but make sense to others. Why a lifelong Celtic fan on the cusp of immortality among his fellow supporters would leave his dream job at this point is downright bamboozling. In fact, it would never, ever happen, and it’s that realisation that has hurt Celtic’s fanbase the most – we were tricked, taken in by a man who knew what we wanted to hear. Read More

Reading Challenge 2017

35
The observant among you might have spotted I’ve got a different bookshelf, which is due to my having moved house

I’m a little late with this one, due to having other stuff going on in my life. (Not really, I’m just a bit slow.) Having gone along with pre-prepared book challenges the last couple of years, in late 2016, my pals Simon and Tom and I decided we would compose our own for 2017. We came up with 50 categories between us, with the plan being to aim for 40 of our choosing, and then onto the last 10 if we had time remaining. None of us made it even to 40, but we had fun trying. Below is the story of my valiant attempt.

 

Title: The Tin Princess

Author: Philip Pullman

Year published: 1994

Date finished: 2nd January

Criteria fulfilled: A book you started in 2016

Comments: Once I’d started reading this, I realised I had never finished it the first time round. I was expecting it to focus on Sally Lockhart, but she only makes brief appearances at the beginning and end, with the main character of this adventure instead being Jim Taylor. The political narrative had perhaps been a bit heavy for my 13- or 14-year-old self, but this time around, I found it much more interesting. It’s quite a tonal departure from the rest of the series, but I enjoyed it all the same.

  Read More

Emmy Picks, Predictions, Unsung Heroes & Oh-No-Nos – 2017

Is it just me, or has it been a really good year for telly? There’s been some great stuff on, or so I thought, at least. A few great new shows and some old favourites still going strong. Lovely stuff, just what we want to see, right? Right?

Oh, you want me to just get on with it? Fair enough. Here goes nothing.

69themmys
Image: emmys.com

Read More

Reading Challenge 2016

shelfie2016
The observant among you might have spotted I’ve painted my bookshelf since last year

Another year, another reading challenge, and I’ve only gone and finished it again. Fewer categories this year, admittedly, but I still ended up reading more books. Go figure. Here are my thoughts on this year’s haul.

 

Title: The Man in the High Castle

Author: Philip K. Dick

Year published: 1963

Date finished: 30th January

Criteria fulfilled: A dystopian novel

Comments: As you’ll likely have surmised, this book appeared on my radar towards the end of last year, after hearing about the Amazon TV series based upon it. Having enjoyed Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, which I read for the 2015 challenge, I thought I would read the book before watching the adaptation (which I didn’t get round to for a couple of months after finishing the book, incidentally). It wasn’t quite the story I was anticipating, as Dick seemed to defy expectation, weaving quite a different tale from the one implied by the premise (an alternate history in which the allies lost World War II). It took me a little while to get into it, but once I did, I really enjoyed it. It was very cleverly done, and I liked what they did with the TV adaptation as well. Read More

Emmy Picks, Predictions, Unsung Heroes & Oh-No-Nos – 2016

Here it is. Did you think I’d forgotten? No such luck. I’ve just been really busy watching hunners of telly for months, and I think I’ve found some good stuff. Some stuff you’ll really like. Some really niche stuff you probably haven’t even heard of. And maybe I can save you some time by telling you what not to bother with. That’s what I’m all about; I don’t just do this for me, you know. So, without much further ado, let’s dive into some opinionated Picks, incorrect Predictions, overrated Unsung Heroes, and categorically correct Oh-No-Nos.

Image: emmys.com
Image: emmys.com

Read More

My Favourite Films of 2015

In 2015, I smashed my 2014 record to smithereens, seeing no fewer than 107 films at the cinema. I know what you’re thinking: “That’s a lot of films!”

2015films
Yes, it is. Well done me. It was tough going at times, but I had to do it so that you would know which films were the best films (in my opinion). I have picked out only seven to highlight, which means that precisely 100 films will go completely ignored on this list, and you’ll have no idea if they were any good, or even what they were. Across Hollywood, directors are impatiently cracking their fingers and hitting refresh, waiting to see if their work was or was not a total waste of time.

Anyway, never mind all that now. My favourite films from the year* are listed below.

Read More

Reading Challenge 2015

books2015

Having started reading for pleasure again in 2014 after much too long a gap, I decided to take on this reading challenge in 2015, in order to expand my literary horizons a little. I am pleased to say that I have successfully completed the challenge, and although it is likely to be of little interest to anyone, I have written out some of my thoughts about the books that I have read this year.

 

Title: Dead Air
Author: Iain Banks
Year published: 2002
Date finished: 9th January
Criteria fulfilled: A book from an author you love that you haven’t read yet; a book with a love triangle
Comments: In 2014 I read 10 Iain Banks novels, and decided to kick off 2015 with one of the remaining five (if you don’t include his science fiction novels, written under a clever pseudonym). I enjoyed Dead Air, but probably shouldn’t have started reading it on a plane, given that the first few chapters concern the World Trade Centre attacks. The story is about Ken Nott, a Scottish shock jock living in London, which is a useful framing device for Banks to go off on several of his thinly disguised and rather delicious social justice rants. Nott is involved with a married woman, and finds himself a target for various people after he goes off on one of said rants on the radio. The plot is not one of Banks’s most complex or compelling, but it’s still a good read, and provides quite a lot of insight into the man and his world view. Read More

Project Bond: Spectre

Image: Eon Productions/ibnlive.in
Image: Eon Productions/ibnlive.in

Daniel Craig claims he would rather slash his wrists than play Bond again, and Roger Moore will not tolerate the idea of Idris Elba playing the role. We now find ourselves locked in a stalemate until someone suggests a white actor with the same amount of public support as Elba, during which we will have little choice but to watch Spectre over and over again. I can think of worse ways to spend our time.

In perhaps the worst kept secret in cinema history, the ever-fabulous Christoph Waltz plays an unusually handsome Ernst Stavro Blofeld, making his first appearance in the rebooted Bond timeline, and his first proper appearance in an Eon-produced Bond film since 1971. (The copyright reasons behind his and SPECTRE’s absence from the series are quite interesting if you like that sort of thing, but you might not, so I haven’t included them here.) We meet Blofeld briefly quite early on in the film, although in the opening half-hour, Bond has already managed to kill multiple foreigners, hijack a helicopter, land himself in hot water with Voldemort, land Voldemort in hotter water with C, corrupt Q, uncover Tanner’s uselessness, corrupt Moneypenny, uncover a video of Judi Dench telling him to kill a fella, steal a car, flee to Italy, attend the funeral of the fella Judi Dench told him to kill, bang his widow, and pass as a beloved cartoon icon in order to gain access to a top-secret meeting. Blofeld susses him out, though, and the jig is up. Bond bravely runs away to his stolen car, which he crashes into a river for some reason after phoning Moneypenny and getting her to Google some stuff for him.

Bond then goes after Mr. White, who you may or may not remember from Casino Royale and/or Quantum of Solace. He finds him in Austria, which we know because Q is tracking him through SmartBlood, which is a thing, but he doesn’t tell Voldemort because he would get real mad. Mr. White tells Bond to go and find his daughter, Madeleine Swann, before saying something about a kite and blowing his brains out. Madeleine, who has perhaps the tamest Bond girl name of all time, gets real mad at Bond and tells him to leave. Fortunately, Q inexplicably turns up, and Bond Spectre Fact Filegives him the fella’s ring to analyse. Meanwhile, Madeleine has been kidnapped and Bond has to rescue her. Q tells Bond he was right all along, and he and Madeleine go off to find Mr. White’s old love nest for some reason, while Q goes home for a cup of Earl Grey. Then there’s a bit on a train that doesn’t make a lot of sense, and Bond and Madeleine go to visit Blofeld at his secret super-villain lair, which makes even less sense.

Meanwhile, C is trying to shut down the 00 division, and M is getting real mad about it. Moneypenny makes her feelings clear by glaring at C, who doesn’t seem to care much, for some reason. Tanner is in a world of his own.

Back at Blofeld’s bit, Blofeld is walking about with Bond and Madeleine, and he and Bond exchange casual death threats. Then he tells Bond that C is ripping MI6 to bits on his orders, and that he was responsible for everything in the previous three films, but they couldn’t show you that because of copyright restrictions. Then he shows Madeleine a video of her dad shooting himself through the face. Then he clobbers Bond on the head and when he wakes up he’s rigged up to some mad torture machine that Blofeld can use to read his thoughts and mess up his brain or something. Then Blofeld tells Madeleine a story about how he and Bond used to be brothers until he faked his own death a while back, and never explains why he now wants to kill Bond, but it doesn’t matter because Christoph Waltz’s combination of cheery demeanour and villainous voice allow him to glide gracefully over the plotholes. Despite being tied to a chair, Bond slips Madeleine a watch that is also a bomb, and she uses it to blow up the base, while she and Bond bust their way to freedom. The base explodes a couple more times so you know Blofeld is definitely dead, and they have it away on their toes.

Back in London, Bond teams up with M, Q, Moneypenney and Tanner to stop C from spying on everyone in the world, while Madeleine wanders off on her own to get kidnapped. Then, in a shocking twist, it turns out Blofeld isn’t dead, and he leaves Bond in the old MI6 building, which is going to explode in three minutes.

Oh, and Madeleine’s in there somewhere, so he can either go looking for her or escape. In the end, Bond decides to do both, and they bust their way to freedom so they can shoot down Blofeld’s helicopter. Bond then has the opportunity to shoot him dead, but throws away all his bullets instead, so he can be with Madeleine. Voldemort then detains Blofeld under the terms of the We Pure Hate Terrorism Act 2001, which isn’t quite as catchy as “bang,” but all’s well that ends well.

Some people say Daniel Craig is now too old to play Bond, but what do you think? Image: fotonin.com
Some people say Daniel Craig is now too old to play James Bond, and just the right amount of white, but what do you think?
Image: fotonin.com

All in all, I thought this was a pretty good Bond film, better than Quantum of Solace but not quite as good as Skyfall or Casino Royale. There were a few things that didn’t quite make sense, and a lot of it was a bit mad, but you have to suspend your disbelief with these things (watching 25 Bond films in a row didn’t teach me much, but it has taught me that). At two and a half hours, it’s on the longer side, but there weren’t any parts that felt too long or unnecessary to me. The performances from the main actors were all very good, and there was enough going on to keep me entertained throughout. A bit like Quantum of SolaceSpectre feels a bit like a set-up for things to come. With the casting of a big name as Blofeld, I would expect they’ll have some sort of commitment from Christoph Waltz to appear in one or two more films (unless they’re planning to have an endless cavalcade of actors playing him after various bouts of plastic surgery, which would be either wonderful or a disaster). There’s also a lot of speculation about Daniel Craig’s future, and if the current discussions are anything to go by, whoever replaces him is going to be hugely controversial. What next for brothers Bond and Blofeld? Well, we just don’t know.

Emmy Picks, Predictions, Unsung Heroes & Oh-No-Nos – 2015

Almost as important a fixture on the television calendar as the Emmys themselves, it’s time for my annual gibberings about why I know better than the TV people about what makes good TV. Now in its fourth year, I’m sure you all know by now how I’m going to take you through this. Who should win? Who will win? Who should have been nominated? Who shouldn’t have been nominated? Why, it’s as formulaic as Andy Samberg’s opening remarks are sure to be.

Image: emmys.com

Read More

And Another Thing… Emmys supplementary post 2015

If you’ve arrived here, you probably came from my main Emmys post. Congratulations. If not, you can find it here. If you haven’t arrived here yet, that’s okay. You’ll make it, don’t worry.
Anyway, this is where I’m putting a bunch of thoughts about some of the TV shows I’ve watched this year that don’t really fit into the gently flowing, carefully structured narrative of the Emmys post. Juicy.

Bloodline
I enjoyed Bloodline quite a lot, but goodness me, it believes its own hype. It’s good, but the mystery aspect is played up far too much when what actually happens is quite predictable. The premise sees estranged brother Danny return home for a family event, where he receives a lukewarm reception from his brothers, sister and father. Something bad happened in the past, and Danny was involved somehow, and we have to wait for scraps of the story to be fed to us.
The tantalising mystery is sometimes an effective storytelling method, but I didn’t think it worked at all well here. There was nothing for me to be invested in so early on, and I didn’t especially want to find out more about the bad thing. By the end of the season, the whole thing had fit together very well, the past and present, and the background of each family member. It’s a good show, well-written and well-acted, but it does feel very self-satisfied, particularly in the first few episodes.
I did not find Kyle Chandler’s character (John) particularly interesting. Ben Mendelsohn (as Danny) makes the show what it is, and the other two siblings (Linda Cardellini’s Meg and Norbert Leo Butz’s Kevin) are both very strong. There’s not much more I can say about the show without spoiling it, and it is definitely worth a watch, but don’t expect it to be the new True Detective. You should also not expect the second season of True Detective to be the new first season of True Detective. Read More